Cases 1 - 10 of 497
Doughty v. Allstate Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Doughty
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company and Maverick Leads, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mark Gill v. City of Hammond, Indiana, et al
as 24-1328
Plaintiff:
MARK A. GILL
Defendant:
CITY OF HAMMOND, INDIANA, THOMAS MCDERMOTT, HAMMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Doughty v. Bright Energy Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Thomas Doughty
Defendant:
Bright Energy Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
HARRIS v. VIVINT, INC.
as 1:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
HARRIS DOUGHTY and DOUGHTY HARRIS
Defendant:
VIVINT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
DOUGHTY v. SIMPLE PLEASURES LOBSTER INC et al
as 2:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOUGHTY
Defendant:
SIMPLE PLEASURES LOBSTER INC and GARY HAWKES, JR
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Romulus v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Tracy A. Romulus
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, Suffolk County Police Department, Suffolk County Police Officer Erik Doughty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Doughty v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03004
Plaintiff:
Margaret Ann Doughty
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spencer v. Glaser et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Legacy Spencer
Defendant:
Edward Glaser, III and Doug Doughtie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
