Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Rodriguez v. Dupnik et al
as 4:2013cv00784
Plaintiff: Ronald G Rodriguez
Defendant: Clarence W Dupnik, Douglas Clark and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2013cv01516
Plaintiff: VINCENT DOUGLAS CLARK
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and C.F.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REAGAN v. CLARK
as 3:2012cv00148
Plaintiff: RICHARD T. REAGAN
Defendant: DOUGLAS CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03343
Plaintiff: Lee Ann Clark and Douglas Clark
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00792
Plaintiff: Lee Ann Clark and Douglas Clark
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50 (fictitious)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrion et al v. Middletown et al
as 3:2012cv00826
Plaintiff: Rhode Carrion
Defendant: City of Middletown , Patrick T. McMahon , James Prokop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reagan v. Clark
as 4:2012cv00421
Plaintiff: Richard T Reagan
Defendant: Douglas Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUFFIN et al v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al
as 4:2011cv00344
Plaintiff: JOSHUA J RUFFIN and QUENTEZ R RUFFIN
Defendant: CITY OF TALLAHASSEE , DOUGLAS CLARK and IPC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
VROOM v. AMERIQUEST TRANSPORTATION SERVICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv03897
Plaintiff: PETER VROOM
Defendant: AMERIQUEST TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, DOUGLAS CLARK, THOMAS BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Douglas Goin
as 11-1498
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DOUGLAS CLARK GOINS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?