Cases 11 - 20 of 7,255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6457
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lima Township Residents et al v. Lima Township Board et al
as 2:2024cv10666
Plaintiff:
Lima Township Residents and Citizens of Lima for Cannabis
Defendant:
Lima Township Board, Duane Luick, Nanette Havens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De Mosivais v. George
as 7:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
America Andrade De Mosivais
Defendant:
Paul Duane George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Campbell v. Beal et al
as 1:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
Robert Duane Campbell
Defendant:
Steve Beal and Junior Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
Duane Barnes
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hurtado v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02266
Plaintiff:
Duane Hurtado, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ezell v. Hamilton
as 24-6085
Petitioner:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Respondent:
COREY DUANE HAMILTON and CASEY HAMILTON
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Moll v. Lamb et al
as 4:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Moll
Defendant:
Jason H. Lamb, Jeffrey A. Suddy, Jr. and Kathrine Griesbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HBA Hollywood Beauty Academy, LLC et al v. Lam et al
as 1:2024cv01952
Defendant:
Thuy Ai Chanh Lam, Kathy Lam, DANIEL NHU NGUYEN and others
Plaintiff:
HBA HOLLYWOOD BEAUTY ACADEMY, LLC, FAB FLORIDA ACADEMY OF BEAUTY, LLC, Ronald King-Wong Kwok and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
