Cases 1 - 10 of 3,342
Edmunds v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01919
Plaintiff:
Sharon Edmunds
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bibb v. The U.S. District Court Judge Edmund J. Sargus's Court
as 2:2024cv01808
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Bibb
Defendant:
The U.S. District Court Judge Edmund J. Sargus's Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Alli v. Sterling et al
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Sterling, Edmund, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv01613
Plaintiff:
Edmund Graham
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Abordo
as 24-2093
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EDMUND ABORDO
Harrison v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edmund Harrison
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Harrigan v. PureTech Ventures, LLC
as 1:2024cv10631
Plaintiff:
Edmund P. Harrigan
Defendant:
PureTech Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Nick Properties Group, Inc. v. Edmund Optics, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Nick Properties Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Edmund Optics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
