Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Stokes v. Madina et al
as 5:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Edward Stokes
Defendant:
E. Madina, Steven Dollinger and A. Tew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stokes v. Gibson
as 4:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Lee Edward Stokes, Jr
Defendant:
James Hoot Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finess Stokes v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-41037
Petitioner - Appellant:
FINESS EDWARD STOKES
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
STOKES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al.
as 1:2016cv02353
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
GLENN EDWARD STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stokes v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2014cv00408
Petitioner:
Finess Edward Stokes
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stokes v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2014cv00406
Petitioner:
Finess Edward Stokes
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stokes v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2014cv00405
Petitioner:
Finess Edward Stokes
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Torres v. Gristede's Operating Corp.
as 12-3336
Plaintiff:
Raymond Allen, Llanos Blas, Nabil Elfiky and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Bobby Irizarry, Ruben Mora, Joselito Arocho and others
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Carlos Torres, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Lewis Chewning
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Gristede's Operating Corp., Namdor, Inc., Gristede's Foods, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Gallo Balseca, John Catsimatidis and James Monos
USA v. Finess Stoke
as 12-40885
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FINESS EDWARD STOKES
USA v. Finess Stoke
as 11-41216
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FINESS EDWARD STOKES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
