Cases 61 - 70 of 7,641
Graham v. Emerson et al
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Christina Ann Graham
Defendant:
Deputy Madisen Emerson, Deputy Kevin Clarke and Deputy Elvin Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv81521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Norton v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01765
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Petri v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv03572
Plaintiff:
Alison Petri
Defendant:
Delta Air Lines, Inc, Abigail Louise Trebnick-Emerson and Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1471 Federal Aviation Act
HARKINS et al v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02086
Plaintiff:
CHRIS E. HARKINS
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DONALD EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emerson v. Shaws Supermarkets, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00626
Plaintiff:
Michael Emerson
Defendant:
Shaws Supermarkets, Inc. and Fresh Ideation Food Group, LLC doing business as Fresh Creative Cuisine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Emerson et al v. NYCHA
as 1:2023cv10009
Plaintiff:
Tracey L. Emerson and Dennis Carter
Defendant:
NYCHA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cadillo-Ramirez v. Garland
as 23-7605
Petitioner:
EMERSON ALEX CADILLO-RAMIREZ, ADRIAN ALEX CADILLO-GIRALDO and ALEXA VICTORIA CADILLO-OLIVARES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Potter v. Emerson Process Management et al
as 4:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Richard Potter
Defendant:
Emerson Process Management, Emerson Process Management LLLP, Emerson Electric Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
