Cases 1 - 10 of 14
USA v. 84902 Hideaway Hills Road, City of Eugene, et al.
as 6:2023cv01226
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
84902 Hideaway Hills Road, City of Eugene, Lane County, State and District of Oregon, $129,822.00 (U.S.), $4,000.00 (U.S.) and others
Claimant:
Kit and Karen Chan Family LLC, Karen Chan and Kit Chan
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Lane v. City of Lees Summit
as 4:2021cv00437
Defendant:
City of Lees Summit
Plaintiff:
Terry Eugene Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helton v. Powledge Unit et al
as 6:2020cv00296
Defendant:
Powledge Unit and Correctional Managed Care
Plaintiff:
Shannon Eugene Lane Helton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Francis
as 5:2019cv00176
Plaintiff:
Eugene Lane
Defendant:
Mr. Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Mcoy et al
as 5:2019cv00132
Plaintiff:
Eugene Lane
Defendant:
Officer Mcoy, Southern Regional Jail and James MaCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Bishop
as 5:2019cv00135
Plaintiff:
Eugene Lane
Defendant:
Greg Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone et al v. McCoy et al
as 5:2019cv00050
Defendant:
Officer McCoy, Southern Regional Jail and Officer James MaCoy
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Malone, William Skeens and Eugene Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper et al v. Gateway Frontline Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04348
Plaintiff:
Kessunga Baker, Trisha Bovel, Viboon Nimitpattana and others
Defendant:
Gateway Security Inc. and Gateway Frontline Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lane v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv00778
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Clayton Eugene Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Lane v. Kelley
as 5:2016cv00355
Plaintiff:
Adam Eugene Lane
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
