Cases 31 - 40 of 5,692
Mullins et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Everette Mullins and Michelle Mullins
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Everett v. medQ, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Debra Everett
Defendant:
medQ, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Watkins v. Perry et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Marceese Watkins
Defendant:
Bledsoe, John Doe, Tyler Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STERN et al v. Ruzich et al
as 2:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
EVERETT STERN and TACTICAL RABBIT, INC.
Defendant:
William Ruzich, Lindsay Moran, Kyeson Utley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Hinton v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024ct03071
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Todd Ishee and Teresa O'Brian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Charleton Maxwell
as 24-1552
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charleton Everett Maxwell
Everett v. Resurgent Capital Services, LP et al
as 2:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Sadie K Everett and Sadie K Barton
Defendant:
Resurgent Capital Services, LP and LVNV Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
David Everett Leibowitz v. Riverside County et al
as 5:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
David Everett Leibowitz
Defendant:
Riverside County and City of Indio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
ADAMS et al v. RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ADAMS and CONRAD EVERETT
Defendant:
RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC and RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC doing business as BRANDPOINT SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
