Cases 1 - 9 of 9
EDMONDS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv10934
Plaintiff:
EVERETTE JAMES EDMONDS, III.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whittaker v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv01190
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Chemours Company, The and others
Plaintiff:
Everett James Whittaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv03578
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Everett James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Myrick et al
as 2:2016cv00618
Defendant:
Dr. Leland Beamer, Christopher P. DiGulio, Linda Gruenwald and others
Plaintiff:
Everett James Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Stephens
as 6:2015cv00146
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Everett James Smith
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Dir TDCJ
as 5:2015cv00031
Petitioner:
Everett James Smith
Respondent:
Dir TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Wellston, City of, et al
as 4:2014cv01700
Plaintiff:
Gladys Johnson
Defendant:
Wellston, City of and Everett James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv85314
Plaintiff:
IMOGENE TAYLOR, IMOGENE TAYLOR, IMOGENE TAYLOR and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RAINES et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66846
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WARREN RAINES, JANEY RAINES, JANEY SUE RAINES and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
