Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Polk v. Lacy et al
as 2:2026cv00148
Plaintiff:
Brandon Chrishon Polk
Defendant:
D Lacy, K Batchelor, A Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
as 3:2026cv12347
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES GERARD M. GREEN, COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, HILL'S PET NUTRITION INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nwoye v. Salas et al
as 3:2026cv02379
Plaintiff:
Queendaline O. Nwoye
Defendant:
Corporal Saul Salas, Jr., Sergeant William W. Gardner and Alberto Gomez-Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Justin Gardner v. State of Nebraska
as 26-2855
Plaintiff:
Justin Gardner
Defendant:
State of Nebraska
FIELDS v. GARDNER
as 1:2026cv01923
Petitioner:
RE'SHAWN K. FIELDS
Respondent:
DELANA GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. USA
as 3:2026cv81588
Petitioner:
Demar Shaki Gardner
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. The Administrative Board et al
as 3:2026cv02401
Plaintiff:
Shawn J. Smith
Defendant:
The Administrative Board, The Classification Office, Clinical Health Care "Personnels" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gardner v. Sacramento Co. Superior Court et al
as 2:2026cv03224
Plaintiff:
Jason James Gardner
Defendant:
Sacramento County Superior Court, Sacramento County District Attorney and Sacramento Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04354
Plaintiff:
Dana Gardner
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
