Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Schulte v. United States Federal BOP et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Joshua Schulte
Defendant:
United States Federal BOP and MDC Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Eischessen et al
as 0:2023cv03691
Petitioner:
Kenneth Quinton Crosby
Respondent:
B. Eischessen and Federal BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LAREDO v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv02713
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LAREDO
Defendant:
USA, FEDERAL BOP, DIRECTOR OF THE FBOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Wilson et al
as 3:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Andre Lyneal Wallace
Defendant:
Warden Wilson, D. Mills, C. Grider and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
STRETCU v. FEDERAL BOP et al
as 3:2020cv00179
Defendant:
GEO/MVCC, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BOP
Plaintiff:
GHEORGHE STRETCU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
James et al v. Federal BOP et al
as 5:2020cv00211
Plaintiff:
Josh Woodey, Chad Tyson West, Paul McNeary and others
Defendant:
Federal BOP and FMC Lexington, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAPPELL v. FEDERAL BOP et al
as 2:2020cv00024
Petitioner:
BRYAN C. CHAPPELL
Respondent:
FEDERAL BOP and LAMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kidd v. Director, Federal BOP et al
as 2:2019cv00113
Plaintiff:
Carlos Kidd
Defendant:
Chairman, Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Director, Federal BOP, Executive Director - TDCJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Kelly Forbes
as 17-7207
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
KELLY FORBES, FMC Butner, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, MARK HORNAK and others
VIOLETTE v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2017cv05030
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PAUL VIOLETTE
Defendant:
DAVID E. ORTIZ, GENERAL COUNSEL, FEDERAL BOP and US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
