Cases 1 - 10 of 133
Freer v. Lincoln et al
as 2:2023cv01720
Plaintiff:
James G Freer
Defendant:
CO Lincoln, CO Barribeau and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Freer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Chien v. Freer
as 3:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Defendant:
Richard J. Freer
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LUDWIG v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
ROGER LUDWIG
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, HUNTER FREER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freer v. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) et al
as 3:2023cv15006
Plaintiff:
Neal Freer
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Spivey v. Martin et al
as 2:2022cv00998
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Spivey
Defendant:
Christopher Martin, Joe Cuellar, Leonel Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STARKES v. MCCARTHY et al
as 3:2022cv03088
Defendant:
HOWARD STARKES, KENNETH J. MCCARTHY and ANNA FREER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daigle v. Mathew et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Claudia Daigle
Defendant:
Francis J. Mathew, Julie J Vargas, John P Hays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mullen v. Freer Trucking, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Phylecia Mullen
Defendant:
Freer Trucking, Inc., Zachary Bernard Moses and Daniel Glen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett v. County of Rockland
as 21-2597
Plaintiff:
Heather Bennett, William Bennett, Ann Cole-Hatchard and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Laureen Connelly, Donna Delarm, Jill Donovan and others
Defendant / Appellant:
County of Rockland and Kathleen Tower-Bernstein, in her individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
