Cases 1 - 10 of 15
TRUESDALE v TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Adaesha Truesdale, ALFRED ALLISON, ALICIA BOWE and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC, TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC, TMX Finance of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Coco et al v. Hexion, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00661
Plaintiff:
Jessica Favorite, Jonathan Johnson, Lashondria Johnson and others
Defendant:
LEAAF Environmental, LLC, Lanxess Solutions US, Inc., Jesco Environmental & Geotechnical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Banks v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv03184
Plaintiff:
Gary Banks
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gary Banks v. Meck, et al
as 13-1906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. MECK, S.C.I. Forest, STEPHEN BEST, Correctional Officer, S.C.I. Forest, RHONDA SHERBINE and others
Banks v. Collins et al
as 3:2011cv01878
Plaintiff:
Gary Banks
Defendant:
R. Collins, Kovalchi, U. M. Avans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Collins et al
as 3:2011cv01828
Petitioner:
Gary Banks
Respondent:
Collins, Evans, Lorgrady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gary Banks v. Mark Mozingo, et al
as 10-2259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK MOZINGO and MIKE HICE
v. BANKS et al
as 2:2010cv00555
Defendant:
GARY BANKS, LT. MECK, STEPHEN BEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Bradley County Justice Center et al
as 1:2009cv00323
Plaintiff:
Gary Banks
Defendant:
Bradley County Justice Center, Bradley County Justice Center Medical Department and Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
