Cases 71 - 80 of 428
Jonathon Moseley v. Robert Vaughn, Jr.
as 21-1673
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT LEE VAUGHN, JR., SOLUTION PAINTING, INC., Has been represented by attorney Robert Vaughn and JUDGE RICHARD E. GARDINER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MR. JONATHON ALDEN MOSELEY
GARDINER IV v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21743
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BRONSON GARDINER IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEWES v. PUSHARD et al
as 1:2021cv00125
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JACKIE PUSHARD, BENJAMIN PUSHARD and others
Plaintiff:
LIBBY HEWES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Millam v. Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
Amy Millam
Defendant:
Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. and Zachary Gardiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Everson et al v. The City of East Point et al
as 1:2021cv01617
Plaintiff:
Marcia Smith, Rosa Woodard, Amiricle Bullard and others
Defendant:
John Doe I, The City of East Point, Nathan Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gardiner v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00408
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Leslie Anne Gardiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GARDINER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11217
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA GARDINER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Damien Ford v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 21-1561
Defendant / Appellee:
William Straughn, Assistant Director, ADC, Tom Cotton, Senator, Ford, Major, Tucker Max and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Damien Ford
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00644
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ford v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2021cv00130
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reed, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Damien Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
