Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Sireci v. Chatham County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2019cv00066
Defendant:
Cot Gibbson, Officer Walker, Pvt Mack and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Nathanial Sireci and Jacob Nathanial Sireci UCC 1-207; UCC 1-308; UCC 3-305; UCC 3-505; UCC 3-408 doing business as Ex Rel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. GIBBSON et al
as 1:2019cv00709
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BAKER and ROBERT RAY RIGSBY
Defendant:
CHARLES GIBBSON and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley v. Kentucky State Penitentiary et al
as 5:2018cv00183
Defendant:
Kentucky State Penitentiary, Deedra Hart, Von Dewinglo and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Wiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chad Thomas Richmond v. Connie Gibbson
as 2:2014cv06812
Respondent:
Connie Gibbson
Petitioner:
Chad Thomas Richmond
Wright v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv02312
Plaintiff:
Wilard Gibbson Wright
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Moseid et al v. Selene Finance LP et al
as 2:2013cv00363
Plaintiff:
Erik Moseid and Dianna Moseid
Defendant:
Selene Finance LP , Credit Suisse Financial Corporation , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Dyanne C Deuel et al v. One 800 Get Thin, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00755
Defendant:
Maria Abaca, Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center Inc, Antelope Valley Surgical Center LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jacquelynn Becerra, Dyanne C Deuel, Samantha Finks and others
Cooke v. Harris et al
as 1:2010cv00671
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
A. Harris, G. Smith, Searles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller/Perry v. Norris et al
as 1:2010cv00033
Plaintiff:
Frances Renee Miller/Perry
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Dexter Payne, Phillip Cargill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herzog v. Gibbs/Gibson
as 8:2010cv00089
Defendant:
Bill Gibbs/Gibbson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
