Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Brown v. Epps et al
as 3:2014cv00421
Plaintiff:
Glen Brown
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Michael White, Q. Abangan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Brown v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20080
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY GLEN BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Jeffrey Brown v. UAL Corporation
as 13-2800
Debtor - Appellee:
In the Matter of: UAL CORPORATION
Appellant:
JEFFREY GLEN BROWN
Trustee:
UNITED STATES TRUSTEE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02385
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Brown v. Thaler
as 4:2012cv03734
Petitioner:
Larry Glen Brown
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gianfrancesco, et al v. Wrentham, MA, et al
as 12-1677
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS GIANFRANCESCO, d/b/a Tom's Tavern and Oyster Bar and THOMAS GIANFRANCESCO, Trustee of Shears Street Realty Trust
Plaintiff:
LINDY'S INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWN OF WRENTHAM, CERTAIN TOWN OFFICIALS, JOHN MCFEELEY and others
Brown v. Contra Costa County et al
as 3:2012cv01923
Plaintiff:
David Glen Brown
Defendant:
Contra Costa County, Contra Costa County District Attorney's Office, Mark Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. State Of Texas
as 9:2011cv00111
Petitioner:
Arthur Glen Brown
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
