Cases 1 - 10 of 1,270
BUSH v. VANSICKLE et al
as 2:2025cv00072
Plaintiff:
AERON CURTIS BUSH
Defendant:
M. VANSICKLE, MILLER, STARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gossett v. Bennett
as 25-496
Petitioner:
MARK J. GOSSETT
Respondent:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Read et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2025cv00218
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.), GARDNER DENVER, INC., Copes-Vulcan, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John D. Read and Sandra Read
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Read v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2025cv00123
Defendant:
IMO Industries, Inc. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Deval Turbine, Inc., C.H. Wheeler Manufacturing Company, and Turbine Equipment, Co.), 3M COMPANY f/k/a MINNESOTA MINING, Gardner Denver Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
East v. Dimon et al
as 2:2024cv00453
Defendant:
Dykeema Gossett PLLC, Felwell & Hannoy PC Attorneys at Law, John M Sedia and others
Plaintiff:
Lorraine C East
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gossett v. Speer
as 3:2024cv06039
Petitioner:
Mark J Gossett
Respondent:
Scott Speer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gossett v. Speer
as 3:2024cv06038
Respondent:
Scott Speer
Petitioner:
Mark J Gossett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Compton et al v. 3M Company f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2024cv10735
Defendant:
ABB Inc., Ametek, Inc.(individually and as successor to Schutte & Koerting), 3M Company f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew S Compton and Elizabeth Compton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.