Cases 51 - 60 of 909
Phillip v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2012ct03168
Plaintiff:
Anthony Roderick Phillip
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gereb v. US Attorney General et al
as 6:2012cv03401
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Gereb
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Harley Lappin, G Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Amin v. Berkabile et al
as 1:2012cv02171
Plaintiff:
Jamil A. Al-Amin
Defendant:
David Berkabile, M. Munson, Blake Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nantambu v. B.O.P. et al
as 1:2012cv02037
Plaintiff:
Damani Muata Nantambu
Defendant:
B.O.P. , Harley Lappin , Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SCURLOCK v. LAPPINS et al
as 7:2012cv00322
Defendant:
Dr. David Allred, Bureau of Prisons, CHAMLEE and others
Plaintiff:
ALONZO EDWARD SCURLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah v. Lappin et al
as 1:2012cv01826
Petitioner:
Khalifa Imam Muhammad Abdullah
Respondent:
Harley Lappin, Becky Bile, Chrss and others
Defendant:
Gonzelez and Finne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Harley Lappin
as 12-2899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR L. HAIRSTON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, FROP and HARRELL WATTS
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
JOHN NASH
Kirby v. Lappin et al
as 1:2012cv01703
Petitioner:
Damian M. Kirby
Respondent:
Harley Lappin and Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roark v. Individuals of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, former and current et al
as 5:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A Roark
Defendant:
Individuals of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, former and current, Eric Holder, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Lappin et al
as 1:2012cv01048
Petitioner:
Cedrick Scott
Respondent:
Harley Lappin, Eric Holder and B.A. Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
