Cases 11 - 20 of 4,883
Morales II et al v. Samararatne
as 8:2024mc00010
Plaintiff:
Kurt Morales II, Brandon Callier and Lucas Horton
Respondent:
Vijay Samararatne
Horton v. Fiesta Mart LLC
as 3:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
Lori Horton
Defendant:
Fiesta Mart, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv02224
Plaintiff:
Jafarris Deon Miller
Defendant:
Lee Harris, Tgichona Baldwin, Anthony Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America et al v. D.R. Horton, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Alabama and South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc and D.R. Horton, Inc.-Birmingham
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Bryant Davis v. Darius Horton
as 24-6299
Plaintiff:
BRYANT E. DAVIS, a/k/a Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
DARIUS HORTON, EXPRESS FUNERAL FUNDING, LLC, HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and others
HORTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
BRENT S. HORTON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Hayes, Cordney v. Dixxon et al
as 4:2024cv10033
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Yvonne Dixxon, Yasmin Oaks, Luis Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Rosie Hopkins
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, Department of Health and Human Service Health Care Registry, Villages of Apex Club and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horton v. Mars, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Paul Horton
Defendant:
Mars, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dunn v. D.R. Horton-Georgia, LLC
as 1:2024cv01330
Plaintiff:
Franchot Dunn
Defendant:
D.R. Horton-Georgia, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
