Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Mariano Ospina v. Indy Mac Bank
as 08-2336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIANO OSPINA
Defendant - Appellee:
INDY MAC BANK
Ospina v. Indy Mac Bank
as 3:2008cv00452
Plaintiff:
Mariano Ospina
Defendant:
Indy Mac Bank
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Madison v. First Magnus Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv01562
Plaintiff:
Sherryl L Madison
Defendant:
First Magnus Financial Corporation, Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
COSTA v. GARRETT et al
as 3:2008cv03778
Plaintiff:
ROBERT COSTA
Defendant:
DAVID GARRETT and INDY MAC BANK
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ferraro et al v. Realty USA et al
as 1:2008cv00778
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ferraro, Michele Ferraro and Ron Reale
Defendant:
Realty USA, Philip J. Wagner, Philip Wagner, Sr. and others
Cross Claimant:
Samual Gamello and Old Kinderhook Appraisal Services
Cross Defendant:
Adirondack Funding, Samual Gamello, Adams Appraisal Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ferraro et al v. Realty USA et al
as 1:2008cv01590
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ferraro, Michele Ferraro and Ron Reale
Defendant:
Realty USA, Philip J. Wagner, Philip Wagner, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Indy Mac Bank FSB v. Anique C. Thomas
as 1:2008mi00129
Plaintiff:
Indy Mac Bank FSB
Defendant:
Anique C. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jackson v. Indy Mac Bank F.S,B.
as 1:2008cv10180
Plaintiff:
Kerry Jackson
Defendant:
Indy Mac Bank F.S,B.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Llanos v. Indy Mac Bank
as 3:2008cv00533
Petitioner:
Julio Victor Llanos
Respondent:
Indy Mac Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Kim et al v. Indy Mac Bank, F.S.B.
as 1:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
Tae H. Kim and Kwang Ok Kim
Defendant:
Indy Mac Bank, F.S.B.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
