Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04486
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 d Federally Assisted Programs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv06922
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00818
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Salem v. City of New York et al
as 1:2026cv07790
Plaintiff:
Salem Ibrahim Saad A. Ali
Defendant:
The City Of New York,, Police Officer Anthony J Festo and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IBRAHIM v. SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
as 1:2026cv11624
Plaintiff:
JAMEEL IBRAHIM
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ibrahim v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv06005
Plaintiff:
Shakira Ibrahim
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Yusuf Ibrahim v. Amy Emrich, et al
as 26-3218
Plaintiff:
YUSUF IBRAHIM
Defendant:
AMY EMRICH, in her individual and official capacities and DERRICK BODTMANN, in his invidual and official capacities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
