Cases 71 - 80 of 150
Kelly et al v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01086
Plaintiff:
Tracey L. Kelly , Timothy B. Kelly , Chad J. Kelly and others
Defendant:
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wiggins v. Hollins et al
as 5:2014cv00153
Plaintiff:
Devan Wiggins
Defendant:
Kenneth Hollins and C J Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Hicks et al
as 2:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
Ennis Lee Brown
Defendant:
Michael J Hicks, Public Defender's Office, State of Wisconsin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. McArdle
as 9:2014cv00323
Petitioner:
Quentin J. Hicks
Respondent:
Barry McArdle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hicks et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv07331
Plaintiff:
Lavonne J. Hicks and Steven Hicks
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05761
Plaintiff:
Doreen J. Hicks
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keiss v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00951
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Keiss
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Christopher Gordy, James Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
William Fisch, et al v. STI, et al
as 13-14986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM B. FISCH, and, SUNIL KAPILASHRIMI, DANIELLE CLAY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SUNTRUST BANKS, INC., ALSTON D. CORRELL, DAVID H. HUGHES and others
Hicks v. Oakes et al
as 9:2013cv01254
Plaintiff:
Quentin J. Hicks
Defendant:
Gregory Oakes, Reuel A. Todd, Thomas A. Beilein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
