Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Russell May v. Eric Bradley, et al
as 20-1729
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, J. RICHARDSON, Trust Fund Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
MAY v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GORAL and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Roberts v. Khounphixay et al
as 2:2018cv00746
Plaintiff:
Joe J.W. Roberts, Jr.
Defendant:
Vilma Khounphixay, J. Warner , J. Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iandolo v. City of Hickory, North Carolina et al
as 5:2016cv00042
Plaintiff:
Stephen Iandolo
Defendant:
City of Hickory, North Carolina , City of Hickory Police Department , Andrew J. Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iandolo v. City of Hickory, North Carolina et al
as 3:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Stephen Iandolo
Defendant:
City of Hickory, North Carolina , City of Hickory Police Department , Andrew J. Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robison et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08883
Plaintiff:
Carol J. Robison and George R. Robison
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robison v. Sojourner Trucking et al
as 1:2014cv00540
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth J. Robison
Defendant:
Sojourner Trucking and Michael Catchings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Robison, et al
as 14-1345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE L. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
VALERIE J. ROBISON, TASHA DOBBS and JOHN JONES
Thompson v. Robison et al
as 1:2014cv01850
Plaintiff:
Maurice L. Thompson
Defendant:
Valorie J. Robison, Tasha Dobbs and John Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
