Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv11126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
JONES v. DIMONTE M.D., et al
as 3:2026cv09824
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONES
Defendant:
R. DIMONTE M.D., ELLEN MACE-LIEBSO D.O., CAMILLA HANSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. State of Iowa
as 6:2026cv02048
Petitioner:
Jessie James Jones, Jr
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron James Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Anderson v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2026cv02690
Plaintiff:
Jaleesa J. Anderson
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, James Jones, R. Javoyne Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Jones, Roy v. Mason, Diana
as 3:2026cv00418
Plaintiff:
Roy James Jones
Defendant:
Sgt. Diana Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Columbia Banking System Inc et al
as 3:2026cv05438
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Defendant:
Columbia Banking System Inc and Columbia Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Lee v. Craft et al
as 1:2026cv00042
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Chris Craft, Amy Weirich, Carrolyn Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tipton (PS) v. Royball et al
as 1:2026cv00859
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daniel Tipton
Defendant:
Joseph Royball, Shirly Mceedy, James Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2026cv00758
Plaintiff:
James Jones and Shelly Jones
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
