Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Baker v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
John Baker
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Valley et al
as 1:2022cv00401
Plaintiff:
Zachary Tyler Allen
Defendant:
Randall L. Valley, Timothy Richardson, Sgt. Josiah Sneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Harris v. Wake County Detention Center
as 22-6841
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY RAY HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
WAKE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, OFFICIALS IN CHARGE OF PUBLIC SAFETY OF NORTH CAROLINA PAROLE DIVISION, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Harris v. Wake County Detention Center
as 5:2021ct03306
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Harris
Defendant:
Wake County Detention Center, Officials in Charge of Public Safety of North Carolina Parole Division, North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caballero et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv02397
Defendant:
Correctional Officer "John" Baker, Correctional Officer "Jane" Summerville, Correctional Officer "Jane" Holligan and others
Plaintiff:
Jonas Xavier Caballero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tripp v. Prudden et al
as 2:2017cv04083
Plaintiff:
Paul Tripp
Defendant:
Douglas Prudden, Alan Earls, D J Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagby v. Baker et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00903
Plaintiff:
Dwain Matthew Bagby
Defendant:
John Baker, Ventress Correctional Facility, Ventress Classification Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. USA
as 2:2016cv12345
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
John Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Baker v. Tennessee, State of
as 3:2015cv01038
Petitioner:
John Baker
Respondent:
Tennessee, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
