Cases 1 - 10 of 12
US v. Jack Leak
as 23-4083
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JACK KELLY LEAK
Kelli Jack-Kelly v. City of Anderson, et al
as 22-3299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELLI JACK-KELLY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ANDERSON, INDIANA, CITY OF ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT and MITCHELL CARROLL
Davidson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv04051
Plaintiff:
Jack Kelly Davidson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
JACK-KELLY et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2020cv02998
Defendant:
CITY OF ANDERSON, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS A. KELLY, S. RICHARD JACK and KELLY JACK-KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2017cv04615
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, RAS J. BARAKA, AMIRI BARAKA, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE PARKER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Reed et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv04941
Plaintiff:
Patricia Reed and Jack Kelly Reed, Jr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENDRIE et al v. NESHAMINY VALLEY SPORTSMAN'S ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2014cv05868
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FRANK HENDRIE, MAXINE R. PAYNE HENDRIE, VICTORIA PRESUENTI and others
Defendant:
NESHAMINY VALLEY SPORTSMAN'S ASSOCIATION, TOM GEORGE COLELLA, TOM CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-12631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv14154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accommodations)
Kelly v. Wilson
as 1:2007cv02856
Petitioner:
Jack Kelly
Respondent:
J. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
