Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Ross et al
as 3:2022cv00747
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Defendant:
Knox Ross, Jr., Frank Boyd, Megan Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harrell v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
James Lamar Harrell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Michael Pippen v. Antoinette Slaughter
as 20-1618
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENNA M. RAGGHIANTI, EVELYN DELAINE BROWN JONES, CRUMLEY ROBERTS, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. PIPPEN and MAXINE B. PIPPEN
Harrell v. Burtlow et al
as 1:2020cv01092
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Burtlow
Petitioner:
James Howard Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19327
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES D HARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrell v. XPO
as 1:2019cv03239
Plaintiff:
James Edward Harrell
Defendant:
XPO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed
PIPPEN et al v. BROWN SLAUGHTER et al
as 1:2019cv00891
Plaintiff:
MAXINE PATRICIA BROWN PIPPEN and MICHAEL J. PIPPEN
Defendant:
ANTIONETTE NICOLE BROWN SLAUGHTER, KATRINA LAVERNE BROWN HARRISON, BRENNA M. RAGGHIANTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
United States v. James Harrell
as 19-2350
Defendant / Appellant:
James Elbert Harrell
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Harrell et al
as 4:2017cv01406
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
James S. Harrell and Plaza Cafe, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Harrell v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14519
Plaintiff:
James R. Harrell
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
