Cases 41 - 50 of 107
Scott Fields v. TX Dept of State Health Svc, et al
as 18-40671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SHERMAN, TEXAS, CARY WACKER, OTIS HENRY and others
Epicurean Developments LLC et al v. Summit Township et al
as 2:2018cv10685
Plaintiff:
Epicurean Developments LLC and The Club at 4200, LLC
Defendant:
Summit Township, James Dunn, Meghan Dobben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Wilmington Trust National Association
as 1:2018cv10271
Plaintiff:
James Dunn
Defendant:
Wilmington Trust National Association and Fay Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Scott Fields v. Texas Dept of State Health Svc, et al
as 17-41178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SHERMAN, TEXAS, CARY WACKER, OTIS HENRY and others
Dunn et al v. Columbia National Insurance Company
as 2:2017cv00246
Plaintiff:
Amy Dunn , James Dunn and Ronald Curtis Patterson
Defendant:
Columbia National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hernandez Pagan v. City of Holyoke, et al
as 3:2017cv30031
Plaintiff:
Janette Hernandez Pagan
Defendant:
Holyoke, City of , Thomas J Leahy, James Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Townsend v. Gyorko et al
as 1:2016cv00180
Plaintiff:
Leroy Townsend
Defendant:
Angela Gyorko, L. Smith, Mr. Fahey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fields v. Texas Department of State Health Services et al
as 4:2016cv00607
Defendant:
Texas Department of State Health Services, David Lackey, City of Sherman, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
