Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
O'Neal v. Union Pacific Railroad We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01234
Plaintiff: James O'Neal
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Neal et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv02382
Plaintiff: James O'Neal and Beverly O'Neal
Defendant: 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00158
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Serna v. Webster We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00020
Plaintiff: Emma Serna
Defendant: Margette Webster, David Webster, State of New Mexico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neal-Sloane v. USA
as 1:2016cv01278
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: James O'Neal-Sloane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McQueen et al v. Chevron Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02089
Plaintiff: Christopher McQueen and James O'Neal
Defendant: Chevron Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Carman-Thacker v. Coffee County, Tennessee et al (TV1)
as 4:2016cv00009
Plaintiff: Tracy Carman-Thacker
Defendant: Coffee County, Tennessee, James O'Neal, William Raline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olivas #124760 v. O'Neal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00061
Petitioner: Gilbert Gonzales Olivas
Respondent: James O'Neal and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armstrong v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01508
Petitioner: Shad Daniel Armstrong
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and James O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Armstrong v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00358
Petitioner: Shad Daniel Armstrong
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and James O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?