Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Edmonds et al v. City of Chattanooga et al (JRG3)
as 1:2019cv00065
Defendant:
Captain Jerri Sutton, Officer Rick Van Ness, Officer Stephen Bulkley and others
Plaintiff:
Alinda Edmonds and Dale Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zwilling et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02281
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Zwilling , Samuel J. Zwilling , Benny A. Leigh and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. Danford et al
as 1:2012cv02476
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Anderson
Defendant:
Robert Danford, Ronald Sellers, Jeff Ragsdale and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farner et al v. Cranney et al
as 1:2012cv11257
Plaintiff:
Betty Farner , Mary Jo Ewing , Rory Ewing and others
Defendant:
John Cranney, Cranney Capital I, Cranney Capital III and others
Trustee:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Danford et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00465
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Anderson
Defendant:
Robert Danford, Ronald Sellers, Jeff Ragsdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Sutton et al
as 1:2009cv06709
Plaintiff:
William Edwards and William Edwards
Defendant:
Jerry Sutton, Star Security Agency and Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Sutton et al
as 1:2009cv06407
Plaintiff:
William Edwards
Defendant:
Jerry Sutton, Star Security Agency and Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Cabling et al
as 1:2008cv01491
Plaintiff:
Jeffery John Harris
Defendant:
Louis (I) Cabling, Louis Cabling, Jerry (I) Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
