Cases 21 - 30 of 666
Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Queen Princess Anjaknie Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas, Elizabeth Queen, Andrew and others
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, Jen Zarozi, Devin and others
Lin v. Wray et al
as 3:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Ke-Wei Lin
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, DOJ, Chad Yarbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wesley Smith, III v. Walter Stout
as 24-1125
Plaintiff:
WESLEY EDWARD SMITH, III
Defendant:
WALTER W. STOUT, ROBERT A. DYBING, BEVILL DEAN and others
Fisher v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Defendant:
United States of America and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barnett v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Caroline S. Barnett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Federal Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rickey L. Alford v. Joe Biden et al
as 2:2024cv01145
Plaintiff:
Rickey L. Alford and Morris Day
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Adam Silver, Maxine Waters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Black v. Biden
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Randy Lamar Black
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Caraffa #350727 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Unknown Parties, Ann A Scott Timmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nobile v. FBI Administration of Joe Biden
as 1:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
Natacha Nobile
Defendant:
FBI Administration of Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
