Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Owens v. Tibbs et al
as 3:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Falcon Owens
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Varner v. Tibbs et al
as 3:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jacob Varner
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francisco v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Ryan Francisco
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamb v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Virgil Lamb
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kincaid et al v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Caywon Kincaid, Darryl Montgomery, Rubyn Murray and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury and Janet Yellen
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WOODS v. VIGO COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
LARRY JOSEPH WOODS
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driver et al v. Wood et al
as 5:2022cv05049
Plaintiff:
Nelson Driver, Teresa Driver and Arkansas Risk and Insurance Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph Wood, Brian Lester and Washington County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lawrence County, MO et al
as 3:2022cv05006
Plaintiff:
Donnie D. Smith
Defendant:
Lawrence County MO, Washington County, Arkansas, Bob Senninger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Myers
as 8:2021cv00470
Petitioner:
Joseph Wood, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woods v. Chadwick et al
as 9:2021cv00662
Defendant:
Mr. Mulcahey, Mrs. Walker, Mr. Chadwick and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
