Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Bobby Cockerell, III v. Mike Conyers, et al
as 23-2988
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBY B. COCKERELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE CONYERS, Major, JERRY GILLEY, Capt, CURTIS BYNUM, Lieutenant, Lt and others
Quinton Davis v. USA
as 23-11668
Petitioner / Appellant:
QUINTON JUSTIN DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davis et al v. HP, Inc. d/b/a HP Computing and Printing Inc.
as 4:2023cv02114
Plaintiff:
Justin Davis and Gary Davis
Defendant:
HP, Inc. d/b/a HP Computing and Printing Inc. and HP, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as HP Computing and Printing Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis v. Mabry et al
as 0:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Justin Davis
Defendant:
Judy Mabry, Latrisha Ferguson, Norah McGlone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Casey v. Bare et al
as 5:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Casey
Defendant:
Corporal Hannah Bare, Corporal Pack, Officer Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earls v. Davis
as 2:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
Jesse F. Earls
Defendant:
Justin Davis, Sebastian County Adult Detention Center, Sebastian County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
