Cases 1 - 10 of 33
David Hough et al v. Ryan Carroll et al
as 2:2024cv02886
Plaintiff:
David Hough, Mouloud Hocine, Jennifer Lehmkuhl Hill and others
Defendant:
Ryan Carroll, Max K. Day, Max O. Day and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Thacker v. Virginia Dep't of Corrections et al
as 7:2022cv00707
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Thacker and Matthew L. Thacker
Defendant:
Virginia Dep't of Corrections, Harold W. Clarke, B. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Alabama Department of Mental Health (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Day
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Day v. Alabama Department of Mental Health (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Day
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01016
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Day v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06300
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lorri K. Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Dewalt et al
as 1:2020cv01562
Defendant:
William H. Dewalt, Matthew R. Bartlett, Michael Register and others
Plaintiff:
Kenni Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant Day v. Steve Kallis
as 19-1416
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRYANT K. DAY
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVE KALLIS, Warden
DAY v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv04965
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, and MERCK & CO. INC.
Plaintiff:
SHARON K. DAY
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riggs v. Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv00005
Defendant:
J Johnson, K Day, Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Matt Riggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
