Cases 11 - 20 of 27,415
US v. Arthur Jones
as 24-6462
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
Pearson, Jr. v. Danfelt et al
as 3:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Maurice Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly K. Danfelt, Dave Ernest, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Cherri et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
Sargeant Cherri, Sargeant Ceazar, Sargeant L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Karon Howard
as 24-6454
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KARON RAYOSHA HOWARD, a/k/a Rock, a/k/a Rocky
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., SLONG, K. FINKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGRAM v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv05993
Petitioner:
DAWAN K. INGRAM
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee, Board of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coates v. Lt. Keistler et al
as 1:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
Alkein Coates
Defendant:
Lt. Keistler, Tyler, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Shadale Lewis Williams
Defendant:
Terrance Steadman, Fred Sedighi, K. Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
