Cases 1 - 10 of 1,269
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, MD, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Elvis Medrano v. Brandon Garland, et al
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
ELVIS C. MEDRANO
Defendant:
BRANDON GARLAND, KANE WAGGONER, GREG DIETCH and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Millsaps v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kane Derrick Millsaps
Defendant:
Moses Jackson and Michael Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baltas v. Salisbury, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Joe J. Baltas
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Rui Diniz, Barry Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custis v. Exmore Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
William Parke Custis
Defendant:
Exmore Police Department, Adam Zieger, Jonathan Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Cheetwood et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Thomas
Defendant:
Richard Cheetwood, William Calcutt, Matthew Medert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crook v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Crook
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Dr. Kimberly Kane, MD, Lynda Aul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Coit v. B. Salamon, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
C/O ABDUL-QUDDUS, CAPTAIN ANDREWS, C/O BARNER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
