Cases 21 - 30 of 2,108
Chappell v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Grady Eugene Chappell
Defendant:
City of Biloxi, Mississippi and Unknown Kelly
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Engel v. Morriss
as 4:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Engel
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Elliott
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Tucker Lewis
Defendant:
Jailer Kelli Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02005
Petitioner:
Iklas Davis
Respondent:
Warden Lynne Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nelsrud v. Warden of Pekin FCI
as 1:2023cv01460
Petitioner:
Kelly Jo Nelsrud
Respondent:
Warden of Pekin FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(HC) Clarke v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv03004
Petitioner:
Lee Kelly Clarke
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KELLY v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv02114
Petitioner:
MARLIN KELLY
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BEAVER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PORTER v. KELLY
as 1:2023cv01094
Petitioner:
WAYNE PORTER
Respondent:
LB KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Frank Carr v. Lynn Kelly
as 23-7241
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANK CARR
Respondent / Appellee:
LYNN B. KELLY, Warden
Hanson v. Davis
as 6:2023cv00414
Petitioner:
Michael S. Hanson
Respondent:
Kelli Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
