Cases 81 - 90 of 9,027
Worden #189767 v. Gearland et al
as 1:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Marc David Worden #189767
Defendant:
Glenn Gearland, T. Blain, Gary Keyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. WALKER et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER and MR. MATIYASIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
York v. King
as 1:2024cv02449
Petitioner:
Donnell D. York
Respondent:
M King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burrell et al v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell, Tyler Bly, Joshua Clamp and others
Defendant:
David Anderson, A. King, J. West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyner v. Steven King
as 4:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Phillip James Wyner
Defendant:
Head Nurse Steven King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Elliott et al
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Milton Wright
Defendant:
Elliott, Hill, Dixie Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02068
Petitioner:
Darnell William King
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
King v. Neal et al
as 1:2024cv02382
Plaintiff:
Kejohna King
Defendant:
Messiah Neal and Orange County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shirley v. Richardson et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Steven Shane Shirley
Defendant:
Richardson, Taylor, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lizana v. Harrison County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Lizana
Defendant:
Harrison County Jail, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Troy Peterson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
