Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Davis v. American Medical Systems Inc et al
as 7:2012cv03775
Plaintiff:
Dessia Kay Davis
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Inc , Coloplast Corporation and Coloplast Manufacturing US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Schaefer v. Roestel et al
as 2:2012cv10820
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Eric Schaefer
Defendant:
Marnie Roestel, Kirt Yats, Mary E Roy and others
Davis v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20305
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kay Davis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
lafrance et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.
as 2:2011cv12398
Plaintiff:
terrance lafrance , Marlya Depauw , sharon lafrance and others
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.
Objector:
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee for the Certificate Holders of CWALT 2004-ECCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cameron v. Gila, County of et al
as 2:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
William Brett Cameron
Defendant:
Gila, County of , Unknown Party , Payson, Town of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Miller-Roach et al
as 3:2010cv01762
Plaintiff:
Charles Mitchell
Defendant:
NFN Miller-Roach, Kay Davis, Gary Lindsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yoder, et al v. Town of Morristown, et al
as 7:2009cv00007
Plaintiff:
Levi Yoder, Jonas Zook, Sam Zook and others
Defendant:
Town of Morristown, Lanetta Kay Davis, Frank L. Putman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
