Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Chapman v. Karp
as 23-923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pamela Chapman
Defendant / Appellee:
Jonathon Karp, Nancy Graham, Hope van Beuren and others
Chapman v. Karp et al
as 3:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Pamela Chapman
Defendant:
Jonathon Karp, Nancy Graham, Hope van Beuren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles Moore, et al v. USA
as 20-36122
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES G. MOORE and KATHLEEN F. MOORE
Moore et al v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv01539
Plaintiff:
Kathleen F Moore and Charles G Moore
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Roland et al v. Alta Mesa Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00212
Defendant:
High Mesa Services, LLC, Alta Mesa Resources, Inc., Alta Mesa Services, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Roland, Randall Kauffman, Marcia Roland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00877
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Ann Moore
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Deacy-Moore v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv15462
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Deacy-Moore
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv12053
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN M MOORE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. COLVIN
as 5:2015cv02060
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN E MOORE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Moore v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv03004
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Jo Moore
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
