Cases 41 - 50 of 2,860
Kendrick v. QuickTrip Corporation
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Tonza Kendrick
Defendant:
QuickTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kendrick v. Oakbrook Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Suan D Kendrick
Defendant:
Oakbrook Corporation, Rebecca Lindley, Heather Gerensky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Lark v. Thomas et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tunisia Lark
Defendant:
Sharne Thomas, David Vanwinkle, Zachary Defouw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sellers, Kendrick v. Schultz et al
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Dane Sellers
Defendant:
Schultz, David, Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutton v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Kendrick Hutton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Perry v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Tyron Perry
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Kendrick #248576 v. Cardinale et al
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Harvey Kendrick
Defendant:
Vincent Cardinale, John Willis, R Harkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollingsworth v. Attorney General of State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
Kendrick L. Hollingsworth
Respondent:
Attorney General of State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
