Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brian Adams, et al v. 3M Company
as 23-5232
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES, et al.
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
In re: 3M Company
as 22-0505
Petitioner:
In re: 3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Respondent:
BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others
Adams et al vs 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00082
Defendant:
Network Supply, 3M Company, American Optical Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Adams, Alice Adams, Edward Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Loudermilk v. Reese et al
as 1:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Chad Loudermilk
Defendant:
Jessica Reece, City of Dayton Tennessee, Rhea County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graf v. City of Nelsonville, Ohio et al
as 2:2016cv00392
Plaintiff:
Bryon Graf, II
Defendant:
City of Nelsonville, Ohio , Mark Hall , Steve Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson et al v. Life Time Fitness Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv01203
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dotson and Sharon Dotson
Defendant:
Life Time Fitness Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Spikes v. Wall et al
as 2:2015cv03774
Defendant:
Leigh Ann Wall, Kevin Dotson Linder, Warren Ledoux Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
James Jerrod Spikes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. State of Georgia
as 1:2014cv02682
Petitioner:
Kevin Dotson
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dotson v. Robertson
as 7:2012cv00395
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dotson
Defendant:
Reece H. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Robertson
as 7:2012cv00252
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dotson
Defendant:
Reece H. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
