Cases 21 - 30 of 38
United States of America v. Sanders
as 2:2013mc00018
Defendant:
Kevin Sanders
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ALKHALIDI et al v. BUSS et al
as 1:2011cv00609
Plaintiff:
ABDULLAH ALKHALIDI, KHALFANI KHALDUN, CLARENCE MERRIETTE and others
Defendant:
JAMES BAESINGER, EDWIN BUSS, BEVERLY GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Murphy v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 11-1107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Murphy
Defendant - Appellee:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Board of Directors, Roland John Anderson, Medical Director, CMS, George Wilson, Regional Director and others
Sanders v. Roden
as 1:2010cv11675
Petitioner:
Kevin Sanders
Respondent:
Gary Roden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanders v. Swarthout et al
as 2:2010cv02470
Petitioner:
Kevin Sanders
Respondent:
Gary Swarthout and Board of Parole Hearing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodney Anderson v. Chuck Biscoe, et al
as 10-40650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY A. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHUCK BISCOE, KEVIN SANDERS and STEPHEN HURT
Anderson v. Biscoe et al
as 6:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Rodney A Anderson
Defendant:
Chuck I Biscoe, Kevin Sanders and Stephen Hurt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rickie Green v. Greg Harmon, et al
as 09-3199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rickie Green
Defendant - Appellee:
Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, James Banks, Warden, North Central Unit, ADC, Randy Watson, Warden of Programs and Operations, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC and others
Sanders v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2009cv00066
Petitioner:
Michael Kevin Sanders
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
