Cases 21 - 30 of 1,355
Knapp v. VGW Holdings Limited et al
as 6:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Eric A Knapp
Defendant:
VGW Holdings Limited, VGW Malta Limited, VGW Luckyland Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lombard Knapp Witt (PS) v. Bland et al
as 1:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Kiki Lombardi, Kiki Kenyatia Lombard Knapp W.H. and K. Kiki Lombard
Defendant:
303 West Colfax, 490 West Colfax, 520 West Colfax and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHARDSON v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TREY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, BRANDY LEEK, ANTHONY BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knapp v. Goudschaal
as 3:2024cv05118
Plaintiff:
Richard E Knapp
Defendant:
Dustin Goudschaal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Knapp v. Wings Credit Union
as 0:2024cv00434
Defendant:
Wings Credit Union and Wings Financial Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Preston Byron Knapp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kevin Coit v. L. Malichaik, et al
as 24-1228
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
L. MALICHAIK, RLPM, BOBBI JO SALAMON, Superintendent, M. ROWE, DSCS and others
John Castro v. Donald Trump
as 24-1109
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, SC ELECTIONS COMMISSION, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR HOWARD M. KNAPP and SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY
Murray v. Parlow et al
as 6:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Patricia Parlow, Lane County DAs Office, Erick Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Knapp et al
as 6:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Erick T. Knapp and Lane County District Atorneys Offic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
