Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jones, III v. Spurlock et al
as 9:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Spurlock, Sarah Horace, Robert L. Tanner, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coffman v. Holmes et al
as 6:2017cv00254
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
John H Holmes, Teara Stephens, Deborah G Cockrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerry Tanner v. Sherry Burt
as 16-2721
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY L. TANNER
Respondent - Appellee:
SHERRY BURT
Tanner #157951 v. Burt
as 1:2016cv01050
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Tanner #157951
Respondent:
Sherry L. Burt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tanner-Bey v. Minnesota Department of Correction
as 0:2015cv02339
Petitioner:
Sheik L. Tanner-Bey
Respondent:
Minnesota Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tanner v. Ryan
as 14-1511
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAWN L. TANNER
Respondent - Appellee:
KELLY A. RYAN, Superintendent, MCI Shirley Medium
Tanner v. Ryan
as 1:2014cv11219
Petitioner:
Shawn L. Tanner
Respondent:
Kelly A. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abebe v. Haley et al
as 5:2013cv00635
Plaintiff:
Unula Boo Shawn Abebe
Defendant:
Nikki Haley, Priscilla L Tanner, Edward E Duryea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Vieux v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv00017
Plaintiff:
Richard Vieux
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Ray Holt and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damon Wood v. TDCJ - Rehabilitation, et al
as 10-40532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMON LEE WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE REHABILITATION & RE-ENTRY PROGRAM, MADELINE M. ORTIZ, Director - Rehab Programs Division, JOSEPH A. BON-JORNO, Sex Offender Rehab Programs Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
