Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Savage v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2019cv02055
Plaintiff:
Carol L. Savage
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pray et al v. Marion County, Florida et al
as 5:2019cv00177
Plaintiff:
William Pray and Selia Ann Pray
Defendant:
Marion County Board of County Commissioners, Steven Holmes, Marion County, Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Savage v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01043
Plaintiff:
Osbie L Savage, Jr.
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Savage v. R.C. Smith, et al
as 2:2017cv01018
Petitioner:
Aubrey L. Savage
Respondent:
R. C. Smith and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pettrey v. Savage et al
as 1:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Lisa R. Pettrey
Defendant:
Thomas L. Savage and Tom-Cat Savage Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SAVAGE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv02511
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
LASHONDA L. SAVAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD WILLEY, R. CARTER, E. HEDDINGER and others
Savage v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2017cv02072
Plaintiff:
Carol L Savage
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
