Cases 1 - 10 of 25
MYERS v. BRATWAITHE et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
JARMAL LAMAR MYERS
Defendant:
STEPHANIE BRATWAITHE, PHILLIP TOLMAN, MICHAEL L. SWARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rameses Lomingkit, et al v. Apollo Education Group, Inc., et al
as 17-16634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMESES TE LOMINGKIT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND and GOVERNMENT OF GUAM RETIREMENT FUND
Defendant - Appellee:
APOLLO EDUCATION GROUP, INC., PETER V. SPERLING, GREGORY W. CAPPELLI and others
Lomingkit v. Apollo Education Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00689
Plaintiff:
Rameses Te Lomingkit
Defendant:
Apollo Education Group Incorporated , Peter V Sperling , Gregory W Cappelli and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Swartz v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01796
Plaintiff:
Darryl L. Swartz
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swartz v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv05096
Plaintiff:
Darryl L. Swartz
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Carol Swartz
as 15-1565
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CAROL L. SWARTZ
Swartz et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv26483
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Jill Swartz and Delbert L. Swartz
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv04107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SWARTZ et al
as 3:2014mc00038
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL L. SWARTZ
Garnishee:
RENZENBERGER
Saleh v. Apollo Education Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv00877
Plaintiff:
Nader Saleh
Defendant:
Apollo Education Group Incorporated , Gregory W Cappelli and Brian L Swartz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
