Cases 1 - 10 of 100
LIPSCOMB et al v. MICHAEL'S et al
as 2:2026cv08094
Plaintiff:
MILAGROS D LIPSCOMB and JOHN LIPSCOMB
Defendant:
MICHAEL'S, THE MICHAEL'S COMPANY INC. and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lipscomb-Bey v. Hicock et al
as 1:2026cv01248
Plaintiff:
John Lee Lipscomb-Bey
Defendant:
Terri Hicock, Lindsay Tate and Daniel Conn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 4:2026cv00082
Plaintiff:
Charles James Lipscomb
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hammond Sr et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04627
Plaintiff:
James Hammond Sr, Edward Robertson, Nicholas Davies and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plater-Melgar et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04299
Plaintiff:
Tracey Plater-Melgar, Brandon Tredo, Jaunise Lipscomb and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walker v. May et al
as 5:2026ct03145
Plaintiff:
Christopher Teran Walker
Defendant:
David May and Adrienne Lipscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent Rice v. Crayman Harvey
as 26-1408
Plaintiff:
VINCENT JERMAINE RICE, a/k/a Majestic
Defendant:
ERNEST T. REYNOLDS, Columbia Police Officer, EMILY DUNCAN BURN, 5th Circuit Solicitor for Richland Counsel, OFFICER E J LIPSCOMB, loss prevention and others
BANKS et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2026cv00313
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE BANKS, AHMAD SALAAH, ALISHA LIPSCOMB and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Lipscomb v. Detroit, City of
as 2:2026cv11060
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lipscomb
Defendant:
City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
