Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Hampton v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10769
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Hampton and Curtis Lee Hampton, Jr.
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, A. Douglas, Leslie Cummings and others
Parker v. Haaland
as 22-2310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jamal Parker
Defendant / Appellee:
Debra Anne Haaland, Secretary of the Dept. of the Interior, Andrew Saul, Charles Paul Rettig Martin and others
Parker v. Haaland et al
as 1:2022cv08107
Plaintiff:
Jamal Parker
Defendant:
Debra Anne Haaland, Andrew Saul, Charles Paul Rettig Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jamal Parker v. State of Arizona, et al
as 21-16325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, Jamal El Trust, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Hampton v. Bishop
as 1:2021cv00126
Petitioner:
Kenneth Lee Hampton
Respondent:
Ricky Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parker v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01143
Plaintiff:
Jamal Darius Parker Moor beneficiary, Jamal El Trust doing business as Jamal Darius Parker also known as Jamal El Trust and Jamal El Trust
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Michigan, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. USA
as 4:2020cv00192
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jessie Lee Hampton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hampton v. Norwood et al
as 1:2019cv01018
Defendant:
Doug Wood, David Norwood, Nevada County, AR and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Hampton, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Norwood et al
as 4:2019cv00317
Defendant:
Doug Wood, David Norwood, McDonald and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Hampton, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv00280
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Donnie Lee Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
