Cases 1 - 10 of 14
GREEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11536
Plaintiff:
ERICK LORENZO GREEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Green v. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Green
Defendant:
The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, The State of California, Warden Steve Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurt Pham v. Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority
as 23-1757
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KURT PHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY, PAMELA JONES-WATFORD, LORENZO GREEN and others
Pham v. Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority et al
as 2:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Kurt Pham
Defendant:
Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, Donna Mills, Pamela Jones-Watford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Green v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv12326
Plaintiff:
Marlon Lorenzo Green
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
GREEN v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2019cv03437
Plaintiff:
LORENZO GREEN
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL, SEVIER and GEO GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seeley v. The Baby Step Adoption Agency et al
as 1:2014cv00871
Plaintiff:
Keith Seeley
Defendant:
The Baby Step Adoption Agency, Larry Green and Nora Lorenzo Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SEELEY v. THE BABY STEP ADOPTION AGENCY et al
as 2:2014cv01796
Plaintiff:
KEITH SEELEY
Defendant:
THE BABY STEP ADOPTION AGENCY, LARRY GREEN and NORA LORENZO GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mallory v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jacques G. Mallory
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Larry Anglin and Lorenzo Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
